15Sep

College Professor Defends Killing of Patriot Prayer Supporter Because He Was A “Fascist”

Isa Ryan

This is the true face of the radical left.

And the radical left has very quickly become a prominent aspect of the mainstream platform of the Democratic Party.

Put two and two together–they basically erroneously equate fascism with American conservatism. That means they want you dead.

A college professor has defended the slaying of Patriot Prayer supporter in Portland last month as moral because, well, the guy was a fascist.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to America's Sherrif updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A few years ago, it was “punch a Nazi,” now it’s “kill a fascist.” And yes, you are the fascist in this scenario.

Here’s the deal: Erik Loomis, a history professor at the University of Rhode Island (who is apparently bent on seeing some of the bloodiest periods of modern history repeated, the way he’s talking), has outright says he sees “nothing wrong” with Michael Reinoehl shooting and killing Aaron “Jay” Danielson in cold blood following clashes between Black Lives Matter/Antifa supporters and members of Patriot Prayer.

In a piece titled “Why Was Michael Reinoehl Killed?” Loomis poses the question as to whether or not Reinoehl was “murdered” by federal agents when they were fulfilling a warrant for Danielson’s murder.

“I am extremely anti-conspiracy theory. But it’s not a conspiracy theory at this point in time to wonder if the cops simply murdered him,” Loomis wrote.

“The police is shot through with fascists from stem to stern. They were openly working with the fascists in Portland, as they were in Kenosha which led to dead protestors.”

“Michael Reinoehl is the guy who killed the fascist in Portland last week,” Loomis continued wrote on Sept. 4.

“He admitted it and said he was scared the cops would kill him. Well, now the cops have killed him.”

In the comment section of the post, one sensible person pointed out, “Erik, he shot and killed a guy.”

Loomis then replied, “[Reinoehl] killed a fascist. I see nothing wrong with it, at least from a moral perspective.”

There you have it.

Nothing wrong with it from a moral perspective.

If you think Loomis is the only one who believes this way, don’t kid yourself. Clearly Reinoehl did as well, and no doubt a host of other professed “anti-fascists” who think a human’s life has less value if they have conservative politics.

This ideological threat is an existential one. They’re not even hiding it. Are you ready to cope with the inevitable fallout once they being killing “fascists” more frequently?

These faux anti-fascists have declared war on the conservatives, war on the constitution, war on police, war on the rule of law, war on God and religion, war on the unborn, war on the American flag. Did I miss anything?

The real question is, when are conservatives going to mount a counteroffensive? Whining about ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter sleazy tactics is not an effective response.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

You Might Like