Truth About Hunter Biden’s Laptop Comes to Light

As the 2020 presidential election drew near, a bombshell story hit the newswire, showing massive corruption in the Biden family.

The timing of the release of the article could have been damaging for the Biden campaign. It is very likely though, that the suppression of the contents of Hunter’s laptop swayed the results of the elections, allowing Joe Biden to win the presidency by around 45,000 votes.

If just a small number of voters in GA, AZ, PA, MI, and WI had been told the truth, former President Trump probably would have won his re-election bid.


Instead of journalists industry-wide digging into the NYPOST article, which broke the story, and reporting their own findings, the far-left democratic media machine went into full-court suppression instead.

Now it appears that the establishment media, especially The New York Times, with Joe Biden in year two of his presidency, has made the decision that is now safe to admit that the revelations found on Hunter Biden’s laptop are worthy of a story after all.

As expected, in their article, they bury some of the more damaging points, including their admission that Hunter’s laptop is legitimate.

People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer, and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity,” the Times writes. “Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.”

In October 2020, the Times cast doubt that there was a meeting between Joe Biden and an official from Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company for which Hunter was a board member.  “A Biden campaign spokesman said Mr. Biden’s official schedules did not show a meeting between the two men,” the Times wrote, acting as a perfect stenographer.

Yet in the latest report, published Wednesday night, the Times said the meeting likely did happen. Biden had attended the dinner in question.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki repeatedly spread disinformation about Hunter Biden’s laptop — before and after the 2020 presidential election.

Psaki’s public statements on the laptop are receiving more scrutiny after the New York Times finally reported Wednesday that emails from the laptop as authentic, after leading the charge to dismiss them during the 2020 election.

When asked about the authenticity of the laptop in December, Psaki said she “neither had the time nor interest” in reading a book about the subject.

In September, Psaki again dismissed questions about the laptop as “Russian disinformation”. “I think it’s broadly known and widely known that there was a broad range of Russian disinformation back in 2020,”

During the 2020 election, Psaki took to Twitter to share the same talking point. She insisted that the Post article must be Russian disinformation because a group of democratic, former intel officials said so.

Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say,” Psaki wrote on Twitter, sharing the headline of a Politico story.

At the time, Psaki was a commentator for CNN.

The story noted former intelligence officials who raised concerns about the timing of the laptop release, citing “a number of factors that make us suspicious of Russian involvement.”

After becoming the White House press secretary for Biden, Psaki has dodged questions about the damning information, concerning the president’s actions, found on Hunter’s laptop.

Biden himself used the reports to debunk Trump’s campaign attacks about the laptop.

There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s accusing me of is a Russian plant,” Biden said during the third presidential debate when Trump.

Five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage,” Biden continued.

To me, this is straight-out election meddling, but with the radicals running the DOJ, nothing will happen.

According to data experts, I have studied, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube’s censoring and categorizing of search results to be favorable to the democratic candidates, had a much more dramatic effect on who people voted for.

The system is corrupt, so how to put ‘the horse back in the barn’ now that it has been released, may be impossible, resulting in corrupt future elections, in perpetuity.

This story syndicated with permission from Eric Thompson, Author at Trending Politics

Is Joe Biden the Worst President in Your Lifetime?*
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.